A federal appeals court in the US ruled that the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control [OFAC] overstepped its authority in sanctioning crypto mixer Tornado Cash.
Background
- The Fifth Circuit Appeals Court three-judge panel say that Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts are not the 'property' of a foreign national or entity
- This means they cannot be blocked under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act [IEEPA]
- They also ruled that the OFAC overstepped its congressionally defined authority
- The OFAC branded Tornado Cash as a sanctioned entity in Q3 2022
- At the time, Tornado was characterized as a "notorious" crypto-mixing service
- The agency also went on to restrict users from the US to engage with the mixer
- Alongside, it also went on to link Tornado Cash to North Korea’s nuclear weapons program
Why should you pay attention?
- The ruling underlined that Tornado remains beyond regulatory reach
- This is because its smart contracts are neither ownable nor are traditional contracts or services
- The smart contracts will now be removed from the sanctions list
- US users will once again be allowed to use this privacy-shielding protocol
- In other words, the government’s overreach will not stand
- Tornado Cash’s governance token, TORN, was trading around the $3.5 threshold on Tuesday
- However, on the heels of the ruling, it went on to touch $34.98
Who said what?
- Coinbase and others had sued the government on the grounds of overreach
- The exchange’s Chief Legal Officer Paula Grewal said,
“Privacy wins. This is a historic win for crypto and all who care about defending liberty. Coinbase is proud to have helped lead this important challenge”
- He added,
“In particular, the Court ruled that while Treasury has the power to take action against “property,” the open-source, immutable smart contracts at the core of Tornado Cash *can’t* be owned by anyone and so are not “property” subject to sanctions”
- The judges emphasized,
"We readily recognize the real-world downsides of certain uncontrollable technology falling outside of OFAC’s sanctioning authority. But we must uphold the statutory bargain struck (or mis-struck) by Congress, not tinker with it"
Zooming out
- No stalwart advocates the criminal and malicious usage of crypto protocols
- Blocking open source technology entirely because a small portion of users are bad actors ain’t a done deal
- The sanctions imposed had stretched the Treasury’s authority beyond recognition
- The Fifth Circuit, in retrospect, agreed











.webp)

.webp)

.webp)

.png)



.webp)



.webp)
.webp)

.webp)
.webp)





















.webp)

.webp)


.webp)






.webp)
.webp)





.webp)

.webp)






























.webp)
.webp)
.webp)

.webp)
.webp)
.webp)


.webp)
.webp)










.webp)


.webp)









.webp)







.webp)




.webp)

























.webp)







.webp)















.webp)

.webp)
.webp)

.webp)














.webp)

.webp)


.webp)








.webp)



