If crypto is an attention market, KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) are its market makers.
Between 2024 to 2025, their business model has professionalized, fragmented, and thanks to leaks, sleuths, and a few spectacular scandals, been dragged into brighter light.
But before we dive into the mess, a quick refresher…
What’s a KOL Again?
In the crypto world, a KOL (Key Opinion Leader) is more than “someone with many followers.” They are the folks whose posts, spaces, or videos can, sometimes, move markets, shape sentiment, or lend credibility to a fledgling token. Their perceived value lies in three things:
- Trust & credibility (or at least the appearance of it)
- Access to “alpha” (early info, project teasers, behind-the-scenes whispers)
- Amplification (many eyes, many ears, one loud megaphone)
Crypto projects pour significant budgets into KOL marketing, hoping to spark awareness, seed narratives, or build hype. That’s the glossy version. The other side is less glamorous, and far more revealing.
An award that reads like satire
Every September, the industry gathers at TOKEN2049, one of the largest crypto conferences in Asia. The event is a mix of panels, networking, project showcases, and, of course, shiny awards.
This year, though, the spotlight was deemed a joke. Professor Crypto, a supposed KOL many on CT have never even heard of, was crowned Best Crypto Content Creator of the Year. Instead of applause, the announcement triggered bewilderment, laughter, and a whole lot of raised eyebrows.
A crypto influencer StarPlatinumSOL delivered a ruthless breakdown on X concerning Professor Crypto award mentioning that he had “0% success rate on promoted tokens,” as well as “50%” outright rugs, the rest down more than “60%,” and yet… two consecutive “Content Creator of the Year” awards.
CT roasted the absurdity.
Another crypto influencer @thegreatola wrote: “Whoever is organizing the award needs to give SBF one as the best founder.”
Overall, the consensus was brutal: the award as highlighted by the people on CT said less about Professor Crypto’s talent and more about how the industry rewards noise over substance.
Beyond One Man: The actual state of the KOL industry
The Professor Crypto fiasco was just the memeable tip of a much larger iceberg. Here’s what defines the KOL landscape in 2025:
1. Bot Armies and Fake Engagement
Engagement is the new currency, and many KOLs still counterfeit it. Allegations of follower-padding are rampant, and on-chain sleuths like ZachXBT keep exposing the charade. The result? Raw follower counts now mean almost nothing.
2. The Great Disclosure Reckoning
A recently leaked spreadsheet by onchain sleuth ZachXBT revealed that over 200 influencers took paid promos, often without disclosure, with some charging up to $70,000 per post. That leak has given people of CT the right to be sceptical on every project promoted by KOLs.
3. The KOL Round Problem
So-called KOL rounds, where influencers get early token allocations in return for promotion, are increasingly viewed as conflicts of interest. Are they genuinely bullish, or just bag-holders looking for liquidity? In many cases, the answer seems obvious.
4. Solana’s Meme-Fueled KOL Machine
Platforms like pump.fun industrialized the meme coin-to-KOL pipeline. Spin up a token, slap on a meme, funnel it through influencers, and boom, instant liquidity. But alongside viral successes came predictable rug pulls and reputational landmines. KOLs who overindulged here often left their followers holding the bag.
5. Multi-Platform Influence
The savviest KOLs now spread across X for reach, Farcaster for community, Telegram/Discord for stickiness, and token-gated groups for monetization. Influence isn’t just social anymore atp, it’s now becoming onchain, with wallets and actions forming part of reputation.
6. Awards as Punchlines
If booths, panels, and speaking slots can be bought, why not trophies? Professor Crypto’s win cemented what many suspected: industry awards are less about merit and more about highest bidder.
Its a Wrap
The KOL industry has always thrived on attention, but 2025 is exposing its cracks.
Followers are now savvier.
Awards once meant to crown excellence now risk becoming memes, while credibility is migrating toward transparency, on-chain proof, and actual results.